Comments on: An Antivirus With a Guarantee… Seriously.

By: Ojalord

Ojalord — Mon, 09 Jul 2007 09:25:31 +0000

And who pays money for this kind of stuff? Or for that matter, any kind of stuff installed on your PC?? Hmmm…:P

By: Ojalord

Ojalord — Mon, 09 Jul 2007 09:22:38 +0000

I too use Kaspersky. Now that I’ve also got PrevX (and it’s good, being a heuristics and community based app), I’ve set Kaspersky to minimum protection and use it only for manual scanning, it’s strongest area. I really don’t think Ca can surpass this combination…

By: alang

alang — Fri, 06 Jul 2007 10:51:18 +0000

I am using Kaspersky for two years. No problem so far and very light. But will try to scan my windows with CA to see whether any virus that kaspersky missed.

By: Ojalord

Ojalord — Thu, 05 Jul 2007 22:36:29 +0000

Microsoft will give up it’s biggest and only advantage by shifting to a unix core. Right now, the only thing that makes me run XP on my computer is the fact that getting a lot of my favourite apps to work on Linux would be a pain. The windows core offers a huge choice in this regard. If Microsoft went unix, then nothing in the whole world would stop me from making a complete switch to Linux.

Am thinking that to avail myself of that guarantee, I’d have to expose my system to the CA guys…Scary!

By: William

William — Thu, 05 Jul 2007 20:13:52 +0000

Personally, anti-virus’ shouldn’t be needed. Microsoft just want to be money whores and not implement a Unix-core like every other OS so that they can make and sell their own anti-virus.

By: Tinybolt

Tinybolt — Thu, 05 Jul 2007 19:12:49 +0000

I have used AVG Free for many years now, on both my home pcs and clients pcs. I have never found a virus that AVG has missed so i dont understand why people would want to pay good money for something that they can get free?

Tiny